Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Chesley et al v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv02178
Plaintiff:
James M. Chesley, Raul Gallegos, Ramon K. Nero and others
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Nathan B. Coats, Tyler S. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 1:2020cv00210
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARTIN GRAHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Henderson25 v. Hardrick et al
as 1:2018cv10751
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson25
Defendant:
Timothy Hardrick, William Prize, Jimmy Murkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Henderson v. James Graham
as 15-7260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. GRAHAM, STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, A. BISHOP and others
Henderson v. Graham et al
as 5:2015ct03003
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
James E. Graham, Stephen J. Murphy, III, A. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Dixon et al
as 8:2014cv03401
Plaintiff:
James Shondell Graham
Defendant:
Mike Dixon, Greenwood Sheriffs Department and Tony Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Graham et al
as 8:2014cv01854
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
James E. Graham, HuLane E. George, Joy D. Honeycut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. THRASH et al
as 1:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
THOMAS W THRASH, JR, STEPHEN J MURPHY, III, CAROL COHRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Henderson v. James Graham, et al
as 13-10641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. GRAHAM, Magistrate Judge, LISA GODBEY WOOD, District Judge, DUDLEY H. BOWEN, JR., District Judge and others
Goodman v. Graham et al
as 4:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Tony A. Goodman
Defendant:
James E. Graham, John Doe, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
