Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Thomas v. Creuzot
as 24-10395
Plaintiff:
Deuntae Thomas, Estate/Cestui Qui Trust
Defendant:
John Coleman Creuzot, #05069200 14th Amendment US Corporate Citizen Acting as District Attorney, Dallas County, City of Dallas, Texas and others
Daryl Bocook v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 22-3383
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYL D. BOCOOK
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN WITTRUP, Chief for the Bureau of Classifications at the Operation Support Center
Defendant:
GARY C. MOHR and JOHN COLEMAN, Warden
(PC) Coleman v. Lopez et al
as 2:2020cv00013
Defendant:
K. Sudano, T. Lopez, D. Plunkett and others
Plaintiff:
Michael John Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv01694
Plaintiff:
John Coleman
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Gilbert v. Massac County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2019cv00747
Defendant:
Massac County Sheriff's Department, John Coleman and Patrick McCoy
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taplette v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2019cv00448
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Vincent Knight, Uknown Whittaker and others
Plaintiff:
Donovan R Taplette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shields v. Maricopa County Superior Court et al
as 4:2018cv00484
Defendant:
John Coleman and Maricopa County Superior Court
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Scott Travis Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Toledo Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2018cv01758
Defendant:
John Coleman, Toledo Correctional Institution, Gary Mohr and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palladeno v. Mohr et al
as 3:2018cv01352
Plaintiff:
Ted Palladeno
Defendant:
Gary C Mohr, Roger Wilson, Robert Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seats v. Mohr et al
as 3:2018cv01052
Plaintiff:
Darryl Seats, Jr.
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, John Coleman, Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
