Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Montrell Holmes v. Lieutenant John Hawthorne, et al
as 22-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Montrell C. Holmes
Defendant / Appellee:
Lieutenant John Hawthorne, Probation and Parole Transitional Center St. Louis, Individual, Korey Kyles, Parole Officer, Individual, Sincerity Rutling, Supervisor, Transitional Center St. Louis, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Hall v. Jordan et al
as 3:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Lee Hall
Defendant:
Ms. Jordan, Mosher, Splan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Ward et al
as 1:2021cv00068
Defendant:
Lieutenant Ms. Jordan, Ms. Wiggs, Tomeka Simpson Dumas and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Hawthrone et al
as 4:2019cv03290
Defendant:
Melissa Brown, Lieutenant Lambe, Unknown Beiter and others
Plaintiff:
Montrell C. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2018ct03174
Defendant:
Ms. Jordan, Chaplain Crumpler, Superintendent Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James and Terrance Lamount James-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Peter et al
as 6:2016cv00003
Defendant:
Officer A. Alford, Jason Bell, Officer Bunn and others
Plaintiff:
Appleton Pickett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv14294
Plaintiff:
Julio Rosa
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Collins, Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Crawford et al
as 3:2009cv00157
Plaintiff:
David R Neal
Defendant:
Dr Crawford, Mrs C Mongomery, Regional Dir Altoamos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Crawford et al
as 3:2007cv00289
Plaintiff:
David R Neal
Defendant:
Crawford, Mrs C Mongomery, Altos Amos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
