Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Rufus v. Pagan
as 3:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Antwan Rufus
Defendant:
Pagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rufus v. Pagan
as 3:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Antwan Rufus
Defendant:
Pagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craft Jr. v. Boshek et al
as 8:2023cv02877
Plaintiff:
Earl Anthony Craft, Jr.
Defendant:
Scott Boshek, Angel Pagan and Carlton Gammons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pagan v. Morton
as 1:2023cv02010
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ortiz Pagan
Defendant:
Roxanne Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Azcona v. NJDOC Staff Male Female et al
as 3:2023cv20804
Plaintiff:
DANIEL AZCONA
Defendant:
NJDOC Staff Male Female, Conspiracy of Attempt Murder, Stalking Kidnapping Fake FBI Badges, Middlesex County Rescource Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acevedo-Rodriguez v. Rivera-Pagan
as 3:2023cv01467
Plaintiff:
Javier J Acevedo-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Roberto Rivera-Pagan and Ariana Gonzalez-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAGAN-ADORNO v. KUHN et al
as 2:2023cv04118
Plaintiff:
JOSUE PAGAN-ADORNO
Defendant:
VICTORIA KUHN, JOHN DOE and DR. JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pagan v. Brogdon et al
as 3:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Lance R Pagan
Defendant:
David Brogdon, Derrick Meek, Gaston County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dekharn v. Rojas et al
as 2:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
Samsom Dekharn and Samson Dekharn
Defendant:
A. Rojas and Jason Pagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres-Santiago v. Ortiz-Pagan et al
as 3:2023cv01151
Plaintiff:
Josue Torres-Santiago
Defendant:
Lester Ortiz-Pagan, Carmen N. Ortiz-Gonzalez and Frances Vives-Suliveres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
