Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Quintez Talley, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-1783
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIANS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS and MINORITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
TALLEY et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv02328
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY, PENNSYLVANIANS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS and MINORITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ST CLAIR v. BOWERS et al
as 2:2021cv01836
Plaintiff:
CHAD E. ST CLAIR
Defendant:
RICHARD BOWERS and JUSTIN ROKEVIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
EDDINGS v. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2021cv00999
Plaintiff:
KWAME T. EDDINGS
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO, RICHARD BOWER and SEAN M. SAMSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CONAWAY v. LESKINEN et al
as 2:2018cv01684
Defendant:
JUDGE STEVEN LESKINEN, CAPTAIN DAVID J. RUTTER, LT. THOMAS ROLENCIK and others
Plaintiff:
HERBERT DALE CONAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Richard Bower v. United State
as 14-3174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard Bower
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
Bower v. USA
as 4:2014cv00441
Plaintiff:
Richard Bower
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bower v. Putman et al
as 5:2012cv05058
Plaintiff:
Richard Bower
Defendant:
John Putman, Ron Kincade, John Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bower v. Putman et al
as 4:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
Richard Bower
Defendant:
John Putman, Ron Kincade, John Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward v. Osceola et al
as 0:2010cv60499
Plaintiff:
Edward Tiger
Defendant:
Max B. Osceola, Jr., Mitchell Cupress, Richard Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
