Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Austin v. Rhoades et al
as 3:2021cv00269
Defendant:
C/O Morris, Sgt. Royster, Robert Rhodes and others
Plaintiff:
Lazerek Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RHODES v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2020cv00169
Defendant:
DEREK F. OBERLANDER and STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION- FOREST'S CORRECTION EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RHODES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rhode v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00705
Defendant:
Lindsy Knopf, Roberts, Blagovich and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Rhode
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2015cv16208
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Conner, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , John Frame , David Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Ballard et al
as 2:2015cv16550
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Taylor
Defendant:
David Ballard , Rose , Iotov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Close et al
as 2:2014cv24624
Plaintiff:
Michael Curtis
Defendant:
Justin Close , Jason Bragg , Brandon Leazure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winter v. Plumley et al
as 2:2014cv26977
Plaintiff:
Jacob Benjamin Winter
Defendant:
Mark Plumley, Clifton Carr, Margaret Cliffard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Barbagallo et al
as 2:2014cv07529
Plaintiff:
Cedeal Harper
Defendant:
Joseph Barbagallo, Shawn Ramsey, Robert Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan Burress v. Timothy Perkin
as 14-6542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUNCAN LAMARR BURRESS
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY PERKINS, Correctional Officer II, JOSHUA HYPES, Correctional Officer, JEREMY ARBOGAST, Correctional Officer and others
Burress v. Perkins et al
as 2:2013cv01970
Plaintiff:
Duncan Lamarr Burress
Defendant:
Timothy Perkins, Joshua Hypes, Jeremy Arbogast and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
