Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Brown v. Shafer et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Cory David Brown
Defendant:
Shafer, Christina Reagel, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Shafer et al
as 3:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Cory David Brown
Defendant:
Shafer, Christina Reagel, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Tyree Lockett and Ty
Defendant:
Robert May, Shafer, Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shafer v. Lumpkin et al
as 2:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Shafer
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Senior Warden E. Holmes and Janet Salles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shafer v. Muro
as 22-40594
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Scott Shafer
Defendant / Appellee:
Lieutenant Javier Muro and Sergeant Nestor S. Ochoa
McRae v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 22-4023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN PLATO MCRAE
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, IRON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PURGATORY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Shafer v. Sanchez
as 2:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Shafer
Defendant:
Senior Warden Jerry Sanchez, TDCJ Executive Director, Officer Zamez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shafer v. Warden
as 1:2021cv03052
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Douglas Shafer
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Joergensen v. Schultz et al
as 1:2021cv02869
Plaintiff:
Jesper Joergensen
Defendant:
Kieth Schultz, Jane Fisher Byrialsen, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
