Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Trejo v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00496
Defendant:
Dr. Victoria Trickett, U.S. President Joe Biden, U.S. Vice President and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Anthony R. Trejo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2020cv01005
Defendant:
D. VARNER, SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT GILMORE, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Badger v. Roberts et al
as 2:2019cv00653
Defendant:
Chapel Religious Department, Food Services and Superintendent Roberts
Plaintiff:
Fred L. Badger
Consolidated Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bracero v. Cunningham et al
as 7:2019cv08285
Defendant:
Sargent D. Curtin, Correction Officer Rodriguez Christopher, Corrections Officer Stuetzle Anthony and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Bracero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valverde v. Folks et al
as 1:2019cv08080
Defendant:
RN Jean Frangella, Superintendent Robert Morton, Sergeant John Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Valverde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00479
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT GILMORE, STEPHAN LONGSTRETH and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS BEAU HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagerty v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv01973
Defendant:
Dr. Xie, CO's Jane/John Does, Superintendent Robert Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Hagerty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Hammonds v. Robert B. Collins, et al
as 16-2170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD A. HAMMONDS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT B. COLLINS
Dorsey v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (DOC) et al
as 1:2016cv00588
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (DOC), John Wetzel, Paul Noel and others
Plaintiff:
Dorsey and Tara Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
