Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Lowe v. LNU et al
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Jerry Kay Lowe, Jr.
Defendant:
Michelle LNU and Monica Tillery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 4:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 6:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holder v. Cooley et al
as 2:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Dexter Deangelo Holder
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Col Lofton and Col Tillery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Thompson
as 23-30682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeremy Dewayne Foster
Defendant / Appellee:
Brent Thompson, Jessie Bellamy, Krystle Simon and others
Foster v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dewayne Foster
Defendant:
Brent Thompson, Jessie Bellamy, Krystle Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holder v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Dexter Deangelo Holder
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Col Holden, Col Tillery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillery v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Jason Tillery and Jerry Lanier
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Correctional Medical Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Jacques v. Tillery
as 2:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jacques
Defendant:
D. Tillery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TILLERY v. HIGUERA et al
as 1:2022cv06638
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARK TILLERY
Defendant:
E. HIGUERA and NAZAROVICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
