Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Slade v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv07259
Plaintiff:
Ricco Devon Slade
Defendant:
City of New York , Gray and Biggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd Luh v. Fulton State Hospital, et al
as 15-2895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd James Luh
Defendant - Appellee:
Fulton State Hospital, John Lyskowski, Doctor, John Brown, Nurse and others
Biggs #105684 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00751
Plaintiff:
Michael Kenneth Biggs
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Corporation, Unknown Lao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ENTITY et al
as 2:2015cv00931
Plaintiff:
DAVID SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ENTITY, MICHAEL NUTTER, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM PPS CFCF CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WYLIE-BIGGS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2014cv01150
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WYLIE-BIGGS
Defendant:
ORLANDO L. HARPER, WILLIAM EMERICK, JESSE ANDRASCIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Barajas v. Robert Biggs, et al
as 14-15513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH EDWARD BARAJAS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT BIGGS, Dr., CHUDY, Dr., ANDREW WILSON, Dr. and others
BANKS v. REALTY COUNSELING COMPANY, et al.
as 2:2013cv01025
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
REALTY COUNSELING COMPANY, JIM SPROUT, CASE MANAGER ANESBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barajas v. Biggs et al
as 3:2013cv01469
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Barajas
Defendant:
Robert Biggs, Chudy, Andrew Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mustill v. Spearman et al
as 3:2013cv01095
Plaintiff:
Sean Everett Mustill
Defendant:
Marion Spearman, Tony Wagner, R. Biggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. State of Kansas, et al
as 12-3081
Petitioner - Appellant:
GLENN A. HEATH
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, PATRICIA BIGGS, MIKE O'NIEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
