Cases 11 - 20 of 46
KOPERNA v. GEORGE HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (GEO)
as 2:2018cv03036
Defendant:
GEORGE HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (GEO)
Plaintiff:
JOHN EDWARD KOPERNA, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briscoe v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv01245
Plaintiff:
John Edward Briscoe, Jr.
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Kindell-House, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2018ct03012
Plaintiff:
John Edward Butler
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Willis J. Fowler, Graham H. Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. CO Collins et al
as 1:2018cv00069
Plaintiff:
Hassan Flowers
Defendant:
CO Collins, CO Webb, John Edward Coumbe-Lilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUNYON v. KRUEGER et al
as 2:2017cv00530
Defendant:
BRAZZELL, JOHN EDWARDS, FBI AGENT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID RUNYON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
RUNYON v. KRUEGER et al
as 1:2017cv04277
Defendant:
BRAZZELL, JOHN EDWARDS, FBI AGENT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID RUNYON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pickett v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2017cv00259
Plaintiff:
John Edward Pickett, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin J. Rambosk, FNU Gangl, Commander McGowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
John Edward Pickett, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin J. Rambosk, FNU Gangl, FNU McGowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jurijus Kadamovas v. Charles Lockett, et al
as 17-1123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT, Warden, Complex Warden, MICHAEL STEVENS, Unit Manager SCU and JOHN EDWARDS, Case Manager SCU
Pickett v. Selwyn et al
as 2:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
John Edward Pickett
Defendant:
Nicholas T. Selwyn, David Lawrence, T. Bowden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
