Cases 11 - 20 of 947
Giles v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Giles
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Chance Jones, Cherryle Hinthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barefield v. Conway et al
as 4:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Keya Deonte Barefield
Defendant:
Cynthia Conway, Joseph Mahoney, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Linsia et al
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Dominick Maurice Jones
Defendant:
Unknown Linsia, Unknown Gunwin, Unknown Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Mena et al
as 4:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Foster, Jr
Defendant:
Mary Mena, Robin Collins, Sierra Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Tilman et al
as 4:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Maurice Williamson
Defendant:
Tilman, Higgins, Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE:CHAMBERS, SR.
as 3:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
MAURICE CHAMBERS and MAURICE CHAMBERS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Executive Director Cook County Health and Hospital Systems et al
as 1:2024cv01610
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Executive Director Cook County Health and Hospital Systems, Susan Shobel, Div 6 Dispensary Training Dept. Head Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Rogers et al
as 1:2024cv01560
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Rogers, Thomas J. Dart and Don Beacham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE:CHAMBERS
as 2:2024cv00737
Petitioner:
MAURICE CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
