Cases 21 - 30 of 5,858
MALONE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00438
Defendant:
JERRICHA MEEKS, RANDY VANFLEET, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD MALONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Demps v. Clara Smith, et al
as 24-12868
Defendant:
FRANK FREIHOFER, C. E. LANE, CLARA SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. DEMPS
Walters v. Odum et al
as 5:2024cv00064
Defendant:
Waycross Hospital, Medical Administra, Unit Manager Craver and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Hayes Walters, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOWNSEND v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00425
Defendant:
A. MOSELEY, D. BEDWELL, JAMES and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. TOWNSEND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00426
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX, MATTHEW LEOHR, JACQUELYNNE PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
DION JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHROEDER v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00416
Defendant:
K. GILMORE, JEREMY HAMILTON, DAWN JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN SCHROEDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley Boclair v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 24-2406
Defendant:
DAVID L. EVELSIZER, ROB JEFFREYS, Acting Director, ROBERT MUELLER, Southern Regional Director and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BOCLAIR
Stanley Boclair v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 24-2397
Defendant:
LLOYD HANNA, Dietary Manager, FRANK LAWRENCE, Former Warden, ROB JEFFREYS, Acting Director and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BOCLAIR
ORR v. CLARKE et al
as 2:2024cv00386
Defendant:
SARAH CLARKE, FRANK VANIHEL, REED and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniele et al v. Skinner et al
as 2:2024cv01909
Defendant:
Unknown Rapp, Eric Miceli, Unknown Drowne and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rounds and Robin Daniele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.