Cases 21 - 30 of 97
Rutledge v. Hatton et al
as 4:2018cv05530
Defendant:
E. Viruet, J. Stout, Z. Shen and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Menard et al
as 2:2018cv00123
Defendant:
John Does (1), Jane Does (2), David Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYES v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00746
Plaintiff:
JORGE REYES
Defendant:
SUPT. ROBERT GILMORE, SGT. OSWALD and J. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PRUITT v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv01658
Defendant:
ACKUDALE, BONE, BRODAN and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND PRUITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwin Turner v. L. Nolan, et al
as 18-15923
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
L. NOLAN, S. RISENHOOVER, R. STRAWN and others
Roberto Chaidez v. Susan Hubbard, et al
as 18-15885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERTO CHAIDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN HUBBARD, Director, GEORGE GIURBINO, ROES, Mr. and others
Landers v. Lewis et al
as 3:2018cv02477
Plaintiff:
Trevor Glenn Landers
Defendant:
J. Lewis, K. Kumar, D. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jumah Moore-Ali v. J. Lewis, et al
as 18-15411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUMAH THOMAS MOORE-ALI, AKA Jumah Moore Ali, AKA Jumah Thomas Moore Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
J. LEWIS, Director of Califrnia Correctional Health Care Services, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES, E. TOOTELL, Chief Medical Officer and others
Harash Patang v. J. Lewis, et al
as 18-15349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARASH PATANG
Defendant - Appellee:
J. LEWIS, Deputy Director of California Correctional Health Care Services, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES, E. TOOTEL, Chief Medical Officer and others
Arthur Gibson, Jr. v. J. Lewis, et al
as 18-15351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE GIBSON, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
J. LEWIS, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES, E. TOOTELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
