Cases 21 - 30 of 766
Jonchuck, Jr. v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
John N. Jonchuck, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Christopher Lane, Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Jump et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Rebecca J. Walden, Roger B. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Cooper et al
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Corbin Lane Curry
Defendant:
Cooper, Gilliam, Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv03007
Plaintiff:
Michael Crenshaw
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, . Holzer, . Edger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Florence County Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Myron Tre-Mayne Lane
Defendant:
Florence County Detention Center, Andrea Capers, Q. Quick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Herrington v. Thomas et al
as 6:2023cv06134
Plaintiff:
Robert Lane Herrington
Defendant:
Sheriff Neal Thomas, Jail Admin #1 Russ Carmack, Jail Admin #2 Brett Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. Lane et al
as 2:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Roderick D Maxwell
Defendant:
Stephan Lane, Tyrone Allison, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Lane, Sr. v. Unit Mg Ms. Martin, et al
as 23-14001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY MANGON LANE, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT MG MS. MARTIN, MEDICAL SERVICES, WARDEN and others
Megan Stepansky v. Jimmy Lane
as 23-2162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEGAN STEPANSKY
Defendant / Appellee:
JIMMY LANE, DAVID BOONE, SHARON BALLARD and others
Lance Braham v. Camacho et al
as 1:2023cv24146
Plaintiff:
Lance Braham
Defendant:
W. Gonzalez Camacho, John Doe, Warden Boan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
