Cases 21 - 30 of 7,319
Brown v. Doughtry et al
as 2:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Keenan F Brown
Defendant:
Dr Barry T Doughtry, Dr Jane Doe and Baier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Gillion et al
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Kenneth Gillion, S Moore, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMSON v. BROWN et al
as 1:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
TORSHAZO WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MR. BROWN, SAM PAGE, CAPTAIN MS. JENNIFER BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrence T. Williams v. Rose Albano, et al
as 24-1892
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE T. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BRENDAN DAVIS, BRUCE SUGGS, SCOTT HUNKLER and others
MURZIKE v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
JAMES T MURZIKE
Defendant:
C T HUGHES, K PERKINS, S SPEARS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dr. Collins et al
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Collins, Dr. A. Acevedo, Michelle Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Perez-Lugo et al
as 3:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Daontae T. Scott
Defendant:
E. Perez-Lugo, Christina Crews, R. Bassa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03943
Plaintiff:
Robert Pearson
Defendant:
State of New York, O.C.J. Officer #039, C.O. T. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
W GIELOW, K PERKINS, J STREIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Davis et al
as 2:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kendall Bowen
Defendant:
Deputy Billy Davis, D. Williams, Lt. Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
