Cases 21 - 30 of 297
Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 23-15567
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson, K WERNER, SOMP Coordinator/ Psychologist at USP-Tucson, L UNRUH-PARKER, SOMP Psychologist at USP-Tucson and others
Douglas Melter v. G. Pesqueira, et al
as 23-15544
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS MELTER
Defendant / Appellee:
G. PESQUEIRA, Corrections Officer, USP Tucson and UNKNOWN PARTIES, Federal Corrections Officers, USP Tucson
Brown v. USP Big Sandy Penitentiary
as 7:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Terrance Brown
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomes v. USP Allenwood PA et al
as 2:2023cv01131
Petitioner:
James Gomes
Respondent:
USP Allenwood PA and Houston House
Defendant:
THOMAS FISCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Keith Drummond v. Gregory Kizziah
as 23-5212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH DRUMMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY A. KIZZIAH, Warden, USP McCreary
Askew v. United States
as 23-3046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEON HENDERSON ASKEW
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY OF LEAVENWORTH, GREGORY LNU, Health Services, USP Leavenworth, UNKNOWN STAFF, USP Leavenworth and others
Michael Gorbey v. Lieutenant Dukett, et al
as 23-1469
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT DUKETT, USP Thomson, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CAPTAIN AVERY, USP Thomson and others
Stanley v. USP Big Sandy
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Steven Stanley
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. USP Lee
as 5:2023ct03068
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Defendant:
USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gomes v. USP Allenwood PA et al
as 1:2023cv00074
Petitioner:
James Gomes
Respondent:
USP Allenwood PA and Houston House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
