Cases 41 - 50 of 3,027
Adam Hall v. DAC Prison
as 24-6261
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE HALL, a/k/a Abdul Al Kareem Muhammad
Defendant:
DAC PRISON and RAYMOND BAILEY, Tabor CI Program Director
Moore v. Lofgren et al
as 1:2024cv03618
Plaintiff:
Ce'Andre D Moore
Defendant:
M Lofgren, Yuhas, T Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feltner v. Kentucky River Regional Authority et al
as 6:2024cv00059
Executor:
Kendra Feltner
Defendant:
Kentucky River Regional Authority, Kentucky River Regional Jail, Inc., Perry County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv02029
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
John Doe, Tom Dart and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sofia Cano v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6200
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DR. CHRIS KUNKLE and others
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Adams
Defendant:
Bryan Bailey, Christan Dedman, Unknown K-9 Officer and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARNEY v. GEO GROUP
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
GEO GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deas v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Deandrae Deas
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kenneth Atkerson, Jeramie Waak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCREE v. FLINT et al
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
ADAM LEE MCREE
Defendant:
CAPTAIN FLINT, SARGEANT WALLACE, OFFICER MABE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARNEY vs STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
