Cases 51 - 60 of 5,587
Onaje Seabrook v. LT. Carter
as 24-6461
Plaintiff:
ONAJE KUDURA SEABROOK
Defendant:
LT. CARTER, SGT. MILES PERKINS, JANE DOE #3, Health Care Authority and others
Smith v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50176
Plaintiff:
Dan Smith
Defendant:
Director Latoya Hughes, Warden Tarry Williams, Dr. Larry Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv02107
Plaintiff:
Micheal Attaway
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Huckabee et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee, Board of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Creel v. Gary Junker
as 24-6449
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RAY CREEL
Defendant:
GARY JUNKER, DR. ARTHUR CAMPBELL, DEBRA FITZGERALD and others
Elghembri v. Doe, Dentist et al
as 3:2024cv02771
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dentist, John Doe, Dentist and Theodore Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembriu v. Doe
as 3:2024cv02768
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembriu
Defendant:
Teacher Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Budney v. SCDC Director of Prisons et al
as 6:2024cv02879
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Budney
Defendant:
SCDC Director of Prisons, Kershaw Warden, Kershaw Grievance Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Budney v. SCDC Director of Prisons et al
as 6:2024cv02880
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Budney
Defendant:
SCDC Director of Prisons, Charlie Anderson, Mrs. Fripp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Nefer Neb v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03787
Plaintiff:
Ken Nefer Neb and Darrell McKee
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, John or Jane Doe, Iris Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
