Cases 51 - 60 of 137
Pak v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2013cv00740
Plaintiff:
Jae June Pak
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander/Ryahim v. Beebe et al
as 4:2013cv00534
Plaintiff:
Charles E Alexander/Ryahim, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, Mark Pryor, Mike Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wee v. Six unknown names agents or Mr. President of the United States Barack Obama
as 1:2013cv06469
Plaintiff:
Daveng Wee
Defendant:
Six unknown names agents or Mr. President of the United States Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v UNKNOWN
as 2:2013cv01198
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
AN UNKNOWN NAMED NUMBER OF US POSTAL INSPECTORS, UNITED SAFETY SERVICE, DAVID ANDERCHAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young Yil Jo, et al v. Six Unknown Name Agents, et al
as 13-2574
Plaintiff:
ANGELO MARRISSETTE
Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAME AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA
BANKS v. REALTY COUNSELING COMPANY, et al.
as 2:2013cv01025
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
REALTY COUNSELING COMPANY, JIM SPROUT, CASE MANAGER ANESBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 13-12759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG VIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA
Banks v. Halke et al
as 2:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mike Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JUDD v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013cv00351
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF INDIANA, BARACK OBAMA and SECRETARY OF STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
KEITH JUDD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grenhagen v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2013cv00118
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
