Cases 51 - 60 of 63
MATTEO v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2010cv00160
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MATTEO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI HOUTZDALE, SUPERINTENDENT RAYMOND SOBINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Small v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2010cv00173
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Small, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin J. Rambosk, Commander McGowan, Ms. St. Villes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Williams v. Officer Robertson
as 10-6204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER ROBERTSON, WARDEN MCCALL, MAJOR BUSH and others
Tucker v. Olsen et al
as 0:2009cv03180
Plaintiff:
Billy Shane Tucker
Defendant:
Bob Olsen, Warden McCall, Mr Claytor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Camejo-Rodriguez v. Miller-Stout et al
as 2:2009cv00175
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Camejo-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Maggie Miller-Stout, Connie Kanehailua, B. Bolinger and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen v. Ortiz, et al
as 08-1300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ALLEN, AKA Edward Clutts
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ORTIZ, Executive Director D.O.C., TOM JORDAN, FRED FIGUERA and others
Lee Parker v. John Evans
as 08-2249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE H. PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, JOHN EVANS, Warden, COLLEEN A. RENNISON and others
Darby v. Padula et al
as 0:2008cv01931
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Darby
Defendant:
A Padula, Lt Williams, Sgt Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kennedy v. Nunnaly et al
as 4:2008cv00146
Plaintiff:
George Kennedy
Defendant:
D Nunnaly, Daryal King, Lt Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Evans v. McMillan et al
as 1:2007cv00591
Plaintiff:
Augustus Hebrew Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth McMillan, Lt. Williams, Mary Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
