Cases 61 - 70 of 314
Swayze v. Marshall et al
as 6:2023cv06017
Plaintiff:
Joab Anthony Swayze
Defendant:
Zach Marshall, Josh Waldrum, Officer Elkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swayze v. Marshall et al
as 4:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Joab Anthony Swayze
Defendant:
Zach Marshall, Josh Waldrum and Elkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chittick v. Dodd et al
as 3:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Chittick
Defendant:
Rachael Dodd, Josh Lane and Phil Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Blackwell et al
as 1:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Allen
Defendant:
Sheriff Blackwell, Lincoln County Sheriff Department, Luke Hastings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleming v. David et al
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Josh Fleming
Defendant:
Alfonso David, Ashly Nichols, Amanda Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleming v. Jefferies et al
as 3:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Josh Fleming
Defendant:
Rob Jefferies, Darren Galloway and Warden Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2023ct03020
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Parsons
Defendant:
Nicole Sullivan, Todd Ishee, Gary Junker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Blackwell et al
as 1:2023mc00003
Defendant:
Jonathan Allen, Sheriff Blackwell, Lincoln County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. Cash et al
as 6:2023cv06002
Plaintiff:
Kobie Joe Henson
Defendant:
Cash and Sergeant Josh Lingo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schlobohm v. Hayden et al
as 5:2022cv03314
Plaintiff:
Matthew Charles Schlobohm
Defendant:
Calvin Hayden, (fnu) Reed, (fnu) Crabtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
