Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Barfield v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Barfield
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, S. Pate, T.R. Mudd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES BAILEY, III
Defendant:
THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, INSPECTOR GENERAL, ANGELA GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Barfield
as 3:2023cv03271
Plaintiff:
Robert Brown
Defendant:
. Barfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinclair v. Rivera et al
as 5:2023ct03180
Plaintiff:
James T. Sinclair
Defendant:
Officer Rivera, Officer Brothers, Officer Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Williams v. Warden Kelly
as 23-6416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN KELLY, JAMES SAVGE, DOC DEEZIEN and others
Charlie Hardin v. D. Everett
as 23-6105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
D. EVERETT, Superintendent, CAPTAIN TURLEY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MULLEN and others
BONILLA-BONILLA v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
MARVIN BONILLA-BONILLA
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTRAL STATE PRISON, JOHN BARFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Davis et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Jacobs
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis and Trey Barfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Waterstraat et al
as 3:2022cv03116
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Waterstraat, . Bowen, John Doe, 11 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Kelly et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Larry Williams
Defendant:
Warden Kelly, James Savge, Doc Deezien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
