Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Card v. Sanchez, et al.
as 3:2024cv03211
Defendant:
Yesenia L. Sanchez, Alameda County Behavioral Health Services, Alameda County and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Card
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTA v. LOVERIDGE et al
as 2:2023cv01482
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
LESLIE LOVERIDGE, ELAL CARDE, CAPT. MILLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTA v. LOVERIDGE et al
as 2:2023cv03140
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
LESLIE LOVERIDGE, ELAL CARDE, CAPT. MILLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. HSU Manager Archer et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mack Carroll
Defendant:
HSU Manager Archer, Lt Maucaully, Lt Card and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Chisholm et al
as 3:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Graham
Defendant:
Melinda Chisholm, Ms. Card, Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alton Brown v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-2751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM WOLF, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DR. A. SANTOS and others
Debtor / Appellee:
MINDY ANDRETTI
Robinson #182351 v. Washington et al
as 1:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
James Robinson #182351
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Jeremy Bush, Norma Killough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2020cv00036
Defendant:
"Nurse Janice", Teri Byrne, C Bogner and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Card et al
as 4:2019cv13511
Plaintiff:
Forest Johnson
Defendant:
Annette Jones and M. Card
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson #669047 v. Card et al
as 2:2019cv00230
Plaintiff:
Forest Johnson #669047
Defendant:
Annette Jones and M. Card
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
