Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Oliver v. Taylor et al
as 3:2023cv01513
Plaintiff:
Charles R Oliver
Defendant:
Morgan Taylor, Kimberly Hvarre, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yarbrough v. Taylor et al
as 3:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Yarbrough
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Taylor, Officer Unknown King and Officer Unknown Torrez
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Low v. Roser et al
as 4:2021cv00187
Defendant:
CPL Roser and LPN Maxwell
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Low
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Turn Key Health et al
as 5:2020cv00957
Plaintiff:
Charles R Stewart
Defendant:
Leandra James, Turn Key Health, Matthew Sumner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClellan v. Johnson et al
as 5:2018ct03263
Defendant:
Charles R. Medlin, Jr., Monique L. Stone, Dontrey J. Chambliss and others
Plaintiff:
Iaian Evans McClellan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. GRIGSBY et al
as 1:2017cv04311
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. ADAMS and SHAWN GRIGSBY
Defendant:
MARTZ, SLINKER and WARNER
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Krueger
as 1:2017cv01187
Petitioner:
Charles R Robinson, IV
Respondent:
J.E. Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rankin v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia et al
as 6:2016cv00147
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Rankin
Defendant:
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, Laura McCullough, Harry Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL
as 1:2016cv07259
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. MILLER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07038
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. WHITE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
