Cases 1 - 10 of 1,223
GAUSE v. COVINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
WALTER TIMOTHY GAUSE
Defendant:
RONALD COVINGTON, UNIT MANAGER NEALEY, S BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01538
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Flowers
Defendant:
Warden Galloway, Sgt. Bernard, C/O Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2024cv02140
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ramos
Defendant:
. Gonzalez, Kim .., Jody Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Danner et al
as 2:2024cv02141
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ramos
Defendant:
Kim Danner, Ellen Hayes and Becky Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Butte Silver Bow Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jacob James Lester
Defendant:
Butte Silver Bow Detention Center, Mark Johnson and Ray Vaugn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
House v. Sgt Jacobs
as 5:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Irvin House
Defendant:
Sgt Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. BUTLER et al
as 2:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WALKER
Defendant:
BRIAN BUTLER, ARAMARK, INC., ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gause v. Covington et al
as 5:2024ct03143
Plaintiff:
Walter Timothy Gause
Defendant:
Captain Ronald Covington, Unit Manager Nealey, S Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, The Illinois Attorney Generals Office, The Inspector General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grice v. Dawson et al
as 8:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Chad L. Grice
Defendant:
Warden Jacob Dawson, Assistant Warden B. Walden, Assistant Warden P. Catalano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
