Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Mark Amonette, MD, Mr. Dillon, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Rathbone v. Sam Quio, et al
as 15-2306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD RATHBONE
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM QUIO, BRIAN L. SHAW, Assistant State's Attorney and JOHN BELZ
HIBBERT v. BLACKWOOD et al
as 5:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
LEMONT HIBBERT
Defendant:
JAMES BLACKWOOD, CRAYTON L SHAW, JOSEPH FLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Medium Security Institute (MSI) et al
as 4:2014cv00331
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miller, Steven Dunn, Tyrone Williams and others
Defendant:
Medium Security Institute (MSI), Ronald Glass, Pat Schommer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Shaw et al
as 2:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
Richard Simmons
Defendant:
Kendall L. Shaw, FNU Lindsey, Mr. (FNU) Beverly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Campbell et al
as 2:2012cv00794
Plaintiff:
Sergio L Shaw
Defendant:
Lt Campbell, Sgt Barrington and Officer McCurry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Campbell et al
as 1:2012cv00794
Plaintiff:
Sergio L Shaw
Defendant:
Lt Campbell , Sgt Barrington and Officer McCurry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Coles v. K. McNeely
as 11-7197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY LEE COLES
Defendant - Appellee:
K. MCNEELY, Inmate Hearing Officer, Buckingham Correctional Center, L. T. EDMONDS, Warden of Buckingham Correctional Center (BKCC), G. K. WASHINGTON, Central Region Regional Director and others
Shaw v. Ajibade et al
as 3:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
John L. Shaw
Defendant:
FNU Ajibade, FNU Powell and FNU Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hardy et al
as 1:2011cv00699
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo M Jones
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Frank L Shaw, Terry McCann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
