Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WHITTLE v. DOOLY STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, CAPTAIN RODRIGEZ, COUNSELOR GERMANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
ALVIN G STANLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, AMIE SMITH, CELLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Tegels et al
as 2:2022cv00969
Plaintiff:
Lontonio Jamin Decruz Smith, Lontonio Jermaine Smith and Lontonio Smith
Defendant:
Warden Tegels, Security Director Jensen, Lieutenant Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Jones et al
as 0:2017cv00135
Plaintiff:
Marshall Leon Watkins
Defendant:
Nurse Jones, Lieutenant Smith, Lieutenant Surratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2016cv00278
Plaintiff:
Dannel Mitchell
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Charles Peck, Craig Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Ellis v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 15-60752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EARL ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, PHIL BRYANT, SERGEANT BARTEE and others
Douglas Whitfield v. Officer Lee
as 12-7110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS G. WHITFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER LEE, OFFICER STANCIL and LIEUTENANT SMITH
Defendant:
DICK JENKINS, Sheriff, RANDLE SMITH, Lieutenant and DARREL LAND, Detective
Cornelius Yancey, IV v. James Farrior
as 08-8346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELIUS E. YANCEY, IV
Party-in-Interest - None:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES FARRIOR, LIEUTENANT SMITH and JOHN DOE, 6
Fountain v. Dart et al
as 1:2007cv04695
Plaintiff:
Timothy Fountain
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Superintendant Salazar, Lieutenant Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
