Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Murzike v. Green et al
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
R. Green, Sgt. Rulevitch, C.O. Mattox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Estes et al
as 4:2019cv01972
Defendant:
Specks, I-I Investigation, Estes and others
Plaintiff:
Charles M Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Carter et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
M. Strickland, R. Butler, M. Laman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Palmer et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00529
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Milton Palmer, Timothy Scott, V. Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Holcey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00384
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Michael Holcey, M. Foster, P. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Jenkins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00250
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Captain Jenkins, Rene Mason, Warden Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byron Wallace v. Estella Bland, et al
as 14-2614
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Byron L. Wallace
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Deputy Director of Meds, Larry May, ADC Assist Director, M. Austin, Administrator and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Estella Bland, Nurse, William Warren, Dr. and Troy Moore, Dr.
Broadhead v. Babers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00210
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Pedehel P. Martin, Benton Wayne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Babers, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Rene Mason, B. Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewell v. Kelly et al
as 5:2013cv00276
Plaintiff:
Damont Ewell
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, M Austin, Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
