Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Profit #389088 v. Rasmussen et al
as 1:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bernard Profit #389088
Defendant:
Unknown Rasmussen, Unknown Johnson, Michael Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Julie Bowers, J Barreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILHOUSE v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2023cv02297
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MILHOUSE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, THOMAS PERZICHILLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nance #168108 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01302
Plaintiff:
Keith Preston Nance
Defendant:
David Shinn, Kenneth Herman, Allen Miser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifton #678615 v. Burgess et al
as 1:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Bernard Clifton #678615
Defendant:
Michael Burgess, Unknown Erway and Unknown McShane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward #113886 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00998
Plaintiff:
Calvin Clinton Ward
Defendant:
David Shinn, Kenneth Herman, Adam Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McShane v. Pawlak et al
as 1:2020cv00717
Defendant:
Matthew LedZinger, Timothy Jolenz, Steven Bahr and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius McShane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWFORD v. FRIMEL et al
as 2:2018cv01124
Plaintiff:
CARL DWAYNE CRAWFORD
Defendant:
EDWARD M. FRIMEL, VITO D. ROSELLI, RICHARD B. MARX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv01095
Plaintiff:
Thomas Moore
Defendant:
Tyler D Johnson, Frank McShane, R Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Faulks et al
as 4:2013cv00162
Plaintiff:
Timmy Thomas
Defendant:
Carl Faulks, Michael Reddix, Carl Reddix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
