Cases 1 - 10 of 15
HALL v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv04034
Defendant:
ALEYCIA MCCULLOUGH, MICHAEL KING, MICHELLE LAFLOWER and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. WEXFORD INC. et al
as 1:2019cv04036
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DIRECTOR OF NURSING, SAMANTHA MCABEE, MICHAEL KING and others
Plaintiff:
BERRY P. STONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv03141
Defendant:
MICHAEL KING, MICHELLE LAFLOWER, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. CORIZON, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02338
Defendant:
JANE DOE, MICHAEL KING, CORIZON, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Williams et al
as 6:2017cv06042
Plaintiff:
Michael King
Defendant:
Jeff Williams, Brandon Grimes, Sandra LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Puershner et al
as 1:2017cv01373
Plaintiff:
Lionel Michael King
Defendant:
M.T. Puershner, M. Mokowski, Slater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry Campbell, III v. Alan Bagby
as 16-3576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harry G. Campbell, III
Defendant:
Terry Pittman, Lieutenant, Henry Osuagwu, Correctional Officer, Ronnie D. Rahe, Lieutenant and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Alan Bagby, Director of Health Services Unit
Harry Campbell, III v. Terry Pittman, et al
as 14-1373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harry G. Campbell, III
Defendant - Appellee:
Terry Pittman, Lieutenant, Henry Osuagwu, Correctional Officer, Ronnie D. Rahe, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
Alan Bagby, Director of Health Services Unit
IMHOFF v. TEMAS et al
as 2:2014cv00044
Defendant:
JOHN TEMAS, STRAWN, MICHAEL KING and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARL IMHOFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Consonery, Jr. v. Joseph Pelzer, et al
as 13-1738
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSEPH CONSONERY, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
NURSE ESTHER, CAPTAIN MICHAEL KING, WARDEN JOSEPH PELZER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
