Cases 1 - 10 of 838
Curry, Nathan v. A. Orr
as 1:2024cv22383
Plaintiff:
Nathan Curry
Defendant:
A. Orr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
HIPPS v. MILLER et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ROBERT HIPPS
Defendant:
LUCAS MILLER, SWAIN and LAFAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Lindsey v. Shane Heiser, et al
as 24-1950
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. LINDSEY
Defendant:
SHANE HEISER, NATHAN REBLIN, JOSHUA RICHTER and others
MCKINNEY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
NATHAN MCKINNEY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Striegel v. Peterson et al
as 6:2024cv06078
Plaintiff:
Nathan Ferris Striegel
Defendant:
Ms. Peterson, Sgt. Couler and Sgt. Windstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FOX v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
NATHAN FOX
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hager et al v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hager and Adam Lee Suratt
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Michael Francis, Tiffany Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrence T. Williams v. Rose Albano, et al
as 24-1892
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE T. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BRENDAN DAVIS, BRUCE SUGGS, SCOTT HUNKLER and others
LAMPLEY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
TOMMY LAMPLEY
Defendant:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., KYLE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Striegel v. White et al
as 6:2024cv06069
Plaintiff:
Nathan F. Striegel
Defendant:
Warden White, Major Otts and Lt. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
