Cases 1 - 10 of 246
Mark Foster, Jr. v. Warren Alexander
as 24-6313
Plaintiff:
MARK BRIAN FOSTER, JR.
Defendant:
WARREN ALEXANDER, BRYANT POOLE and CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, Eastern Correctional
BANNER v. ROWDY et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
MONTREALL BANNER
Defendant:
C/O ROWDY, C/O GOMEZ, MAC MILLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole, Leo V. v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2024cv80469
Plaintiff:
Leo Vincent Poole and Vincent Leo Poole
Defendant:
Rick Bradshaw and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
CORBETT v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.
Defendant:
ERIK HOOKS, CHRISTOPHER RICH, KATY POOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Stroud et al
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Gary W Gardner
Defendant:
Stroud, Deborah Goodwin, Linda Sanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv03357
Plaintiff:
Lesean Jackson
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, . Holzer, B Pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. SANYANG et al
as 1:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
DARRELL BERNARD COOPER
Defendant:
LAWANDA SANYANG, LADONNA PRICE, ROBIN WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv03957
Plaintiff:
Lesean Jackson
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Lietinant Holzer, B Pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Poole et al
as 4:2023cv04096
Plaintiff:
Justin Richard Haywood
Defendant:
Detective Jeremy Poole, Sgt. Tony Hanning and Sergeant Eleely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tevin Robinson v. Officer Brandon Yeeley, et al
as 23-2486
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tevin Deray Robinson
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer Brandon Yeeley, Officer Alexander Ellis and Corporal Horace Poole
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
