Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Michael Burnett v. Bryan Morrison, et al
as 23-2094
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANGELO BURNETT
Defendant:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden, individual and official capacities, LIEUTENANT BORIS, individual capacity, SERGEANT GARRETT, individual capacity and others
Burnett #200640 v. Morrison et al
as 1:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Burnett #200640
Defendant:
Bryan Morrison, Unknown Boris, Unknown Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marl v. Stolle et al
as 2:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Bryce Marl
Defendant:
Ken Stolle and Abdul Jamaludeen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR et al v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS/MCF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. HYATTE et al
as 1:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER G. LEWIS
Defendant:
WILLIAM HYATTE, MARY LASSITER, JACQUELINE SCAIFE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Stolle et al
as 2:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Deputy Brown, Sheriff Ken Stolle and R. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Daniel Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siles v. Stolle et al
as 1:2019cv01537
Defendant:
N. Ingrams, Sgt. Saucier, Dr. Jay and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Siles, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armonti v. Stolle et al
as 2:2019cv00423
Defendant:
Hon. Kenneth Stolle, N. Curtis, Katie C.X and others
Plaintiff:
Montcier Paris Armonti and Montcler Paris Armonti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Farris et al
as 2:2019cv00115
Defendant:
Ken Stolle, M. Farris and Naph Care Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alexander Allen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett v. Stolle et al
as 2:2018cv00655
Defendant:
Kenneth Stolle, Sgt Midgett, Deputy Wells and others
Plaintiff:
Alex J. Burnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
