Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Eidam v. Behnke et al
as 1:2019cv00266
Defendant:
Tim Smith, Cass, County of and Richard Behnke
Plaintiff:
Jason Eidam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynn (ID 64377) v. Cline et al
as 5:2019cv03003
Defendant:
Roland Buchanan, Sherri Price, Tyler Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick C. Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Haberer et al
as 5:2018cv03246
Defendant:
Corizon Company, Connie R. Delperdang, Deane Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00380
Defendant:
Roland Buchanan, Gloria Gethier, Unknown Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS ET AL et al
as 1:2015cv00117
Plaintiff:
ERNEST GRAY, JR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS ET AL, A.W. STRASSER, HOWARD BARON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kifayatullah (ID 62313) v. Johnson et al
as 5:2015cv03082
Plaintiff:
Rashad Kifayatullah
Defendant:
Randolph W. Johnson, Mary Nelson, Tim Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. ST. MARYS/ELK REGIONAL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
MARLON JONES
Defendant:
ST. MARYS/ELK REGIONAL HOSPITAL, KANE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, RUDICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2014cv00230
Plaintiff:
CURTIS PRICE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, KENNETH CAMERON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Diggs v. Sheriff Jim Arnott, et al
as 13-1632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert O. Diggs
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheriff Jim Arnott, Administrator Tim Smith, Harold Bengsch and others
HINES v. CAMERON
as 3:2011cv01117
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD HINES, IV
Defendant:
Tony Cameron, James Mills, JERNIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
