Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Haig v. Florida Civil Commitment Center
as 2:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Ericross Zander Haig
Defendant:
Florida Civil Commitment Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Miles et al
as 1:2023cv16342
Petitioner:
Khalid Norwood
Respondent:
Sherwin Miles, . Terry, . Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Miles et al
as 2:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
Khalid Norwood
Defendant:
Sherwin Miles, . Terry, . Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zander v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08278
Plaintiff:
Brian K Zander
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Dickerson v. Ken Scarlette, et al
as 23-1621
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL DICKERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KEN SCARLETTE, JOHN DOE, Sergeant, Springfield Police Officer, JANE DOE, Springfield Police Officer and others
Charles Ray Ricketts v. Sheriff, et al
as 22-11162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES RAY RICKETTS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF, WASHINGTON, Sgt, ZANDER PATTERSON, Deputy and others
Ricketts v. Pettway et al
as 2:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Ricketts
Defendant:
Mark Pettway, Washington, Zander Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Morley et al
as 7:2020cv07381
Defendant:
Nurse Administator Diane Hinton, Dermathologist Miranda Zander, Chief Doctor John Morley and others
Plaintiff:
Sampson Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELCH v. CARTER et al
as 3:2020cv00101
Defendant:
GREGG ZANDERS, JACK HENDRIX, CULLEN SCOTT and others
Plaintiff:
DEMITRIUS L. WELCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knowles v. D.O.C.R. et al
as 1:2019cv00098
Defendant:
Shaun Fode, Steve Bement, Dave Roggenbuck and others
Plaintiff:
Efrain Reyes Knowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
