Cases 161 - 170 of 2,910
Phillip Mannebach v. USA
as 23-1886
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP EARL MANNEBACH
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McNulty, Ned v. Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center
as 3:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
Ned Charles McNulty, II
Defendant:
Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hills v. Reeves et al
as 1:2023cv02542
Plaintiff:
Lori Hills
Defendant:
Terry (I) Reeves, Terry Reeves, Tim Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions
as 2:2023cv04844
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tucker
Defendant:
Wellpath Recovery Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Mackel v. Shan Jumper, et al
as 23-2866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID L. MACKEL
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAN JUMPER, PAULA LODGE, HEATHER HYMES and others
Kendrid v.Schuyler et al
as 3:2023cv04762
Plaintiff:
Forrest Kendrid
Defendant:
Warden Charles Schuyler, H. Lomeli and Scott Langeuin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Harpsteadt et al
as 0:2023cv02848
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miles
Defendant:
Jodi Harpsteadt, Nancy Johnston and Terry Kneisel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Walls v. State of Illinois, et al
as 23-2778
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM WALLS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, COOK COUNTY STATE'S ATTORNEY OFFICE, OFFICE OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Strutton et al v. Hacker et al
as 4:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
Dennis Strutton and James Moller
Defendant:
Denise Hacker, Christopher Chamberlain, George Killian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrington v. Sun et al
as 5:2023ct03264
Plaintiff:
Theodore Macon Carrington, Jr.
Defendant:
Paul K. Sun, Jr., Ellis & Winters LLP and Office of the Federal Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
