Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Miles v. Johnston et al
as 0:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miles
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Nancy Stacken, Courtney Menton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kineard v. Carner et al
as 2:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Michael Barry Kineard
Defendant:
Jon Carner, Robert Houston, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis
as 3:2023cv03659
Plaintiff:
Daniel Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Louck-Davis et al
as 4:2023cv04028
Plaintiff:
Donnie R Barrett
Defendant:
Amy Louck-Davis and Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry Branson v. Emily Johnson Piper, et al
as 23-1160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terry Lee Branson
Defendant / Appellee:
Emily Johnson Piper, in their official and individual capacity, Nancy Johnston, in their official and individual capacity, Shelby Richardson, in their official and individual capacity and others
Darryl Davis, et al v. Sherry Yates, et al
as 23-1132
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DARRYL DAVIS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN GROHS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERRY YATES and SARAH DAVIS
Martin v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions
as 4:2022cv02043
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shane Martin
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Erin Gaffney, Brian Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
McLeod v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv00102
Defendant:
Lynn Melton, Barbara Darlene McDonald and Dr. Marion Davis
Plaintiff:
Ryan Randolph McLeod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCombs v. Davis
as 2:2019cv01652
Defendant:
Ms Davis
Plaintiff:
John McCombs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program et al
as 0:2018cv03352
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Katie McDowell, Joseph Mullen and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Aaron Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
