Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Wirth et al v. Burton et al
as 0:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Donald Joseph Wirth, Jr and Nicholas Thomas Stroeder
Defendant:
James Julis Burton, Jane Doe Number 1, Jane Doe Number 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin Fitzpatrick v. Robert Busche, et al
as 23-3053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN C. FITZPATRICK
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT BUSCHE, Doctor, JOHN DOE, Sergeant, B.K., JOHN DOE 2 and others
Robert Lough v. DSHS, et al
as 22-35631
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOUGH
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, WASHINGTON STATE SPECIAL COMMITMENT CENTER, DAVID FLYNN, SCC CEO and others
Mendez v. Kallis et al
as 0:2020cv01084
Defendant:
Unit Team 2 and Warden S. Kallis
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2020cv00501
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Minnesota Department of Human Services, Kevin D. Moser and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bettys v. Hamil et al
as 3:2020cv05078
Defendant:
Mark McFarland, Elana Lopez, John/Jane Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
John Edward Bettys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Dobier et al
as 4:2018cv04222
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Maxwell
Defendant:
N. Hernandez, Colehand, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wahl v. Jumper et al
as 4:2018cv04068
Plaintiff:
Chad Wahl
Defendant:
Dr. Shan Jumper, Gregg Scott, Ebony E. Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweate v. Jackson County, Missouri et al
as 4:2017cv00498
Plaintiff:
Davonta Sweate
Defendant:
Jackson County, Missouri , Joseph Piccinini , Patricia Woolfolk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adkins v. Morgan County Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
James Travis Adkins
Defendant:
Morgan County Tennessee , Glen Freytag , John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
