Cases 11 - 20 of 20
United States of America v. One 2014 Honda Accord Sport et al
as 1:2014mi00115
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One 2014 Honda Accord Sport, One 2011 Mercedes Benz, One Apple Macbook Pro Computer with Green Case and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Prevezon Holdings Ltd. et al
as 1:2013cv06326
Defendant:
Prevezon Holdings Ltd., Prevezon 1810, L.L.C., ANY AND ALL FUNDS ON DEPOSIT IN BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER **********6021 HELD IN THE NAME OF PREVEZON SEVEN USA LLC and others
Petitioner:
Victoria Tarantino Consulting LLC, Hermitage Capital Management Ltd., Sundance Aspen, LLC and others
Claimant:
Martash Holdings, IKR and Denis Katsyv
Interested Party:
HSBC Private Bank (Suisse) S.A., Baker & Hostetler LLP and Hermitage Global Partners LP
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Any and All Assets of Prevezon Soho USA, L.L.C. incl;uding but not limited to any and all funds on deposit in bank of america acct # 483016158084
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Baker Personal Property
as 7:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Baker Personal Property Specifically, A Remington 870 12 Guage Shotgun, A High Point Arms .45 Caliber Handgun and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0924
United States of America v. Approximately $50,319.11 seized from 49er Credit Union Bank, held in the names of Gregory S. Baker and Darrell Hinz et al
as 2:2012at00857
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $50,319.11 seized from 49er Credit Union Bank, held in the names of Gregory S. Baker and Darrell Hinz, Double Wide Mobile Home Trailer located at 6170 Nob Hill Drive, Space 76, Newcastle, CA, 2,363 Shares of Greater Sacramento Bancorp held in the name of Gregory S. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Approximately $50,319.11 seized from 49er Credit Union Bank, held in the names of Gregory S. Baker and Darrell Hinz et al
as 2:2012cv01632
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $50,319.11 seized from 49er Credit Union Bank, held in the names of Gregory S. Baker and Darrell Hinz, Double Wide Mobile Home Trailer located at 6170 Nob Hill Drive, Space 76, Newcastle, CA, 2,363 Shares of Greater Sacramento Bancorp held in the name of Gregory S. Baker and others
Claimant:
Darrell Hinz , Gregory Baker and Dawn Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Luebke Baker & Associates et al
as 1:2012cv01145
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luebke Baker & Associates, Kevin J Luebke, Matthew T Scott and others
Miscellaneous_party:
Julissa W Luebke
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
USA v. Holy Land Fdn for Relief, et al
as 11-10535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
HOLY LAND FOUNDATION FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT, also known as HLF, SHUKRI ABU BAKER, GHASSAN ELASHI and others
Appellee:
JENNY RUBIN, DEBORAH RUBIN, DANIEL MILLER and others
United States of America
as 3:2011cv01101
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$10,675.86 in Funds Contained in Account Number 0053-XXXXXXX9897 in the Name of Clark E. Baker at the Vanguard Group Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania and $370,538.27 in Funds Contained in Account Number 0551-XXXXXXX9897 in the Name of Clark E. Baker at the Vanguard Group Inc., Malvern Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Flossie McMurry v. Continental Management, LLC, et al
as 10-1665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOSSIE MCMURRY
Defendant - Appellee:
CONTINENTAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, HUD, TIM FOX, Proprietor, Bella Vista Glen Subsidized Apartment (HUD), MICHELL STOKES, Former Property Manager, Lesso Highland Park, Michigan and others
McMurry v. Continental Management, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv11181
Plaintiff:
Flossie W McMurry
Defendant:
Continental Management, LLC, Tim Fox, Michell Stokes and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
