Cases 41 - 50 of 103
SHARPE v. THE CHEESECAKE FACTORY RESTAURANTS, INC.
as 2:2017cv03205
Plaintiff:
TIA SHARPE
Defendant:
THE CHEESECAKE FACTORY RESTAURANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sharp v. ABP, Inc. et al
as 7:2017cv00091
Defendant:
ABP, Inc. and Phillip Arther
Plaintiff:
Robert Sharp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
SHARP v. F.A.S.T. GLOBAL MARKETING, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00127
Defendant:
F.A.S.T. GLOBAL MARKETING, INC. and TOFIQ BOLWALA
Plaintiff:
CAMBRIA SHARP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Villegas v. Maestranzi Sharp Knife Services et al
as 1:2016cv09217
Plaintiff:
Olegario Villegas
Defendant:
Maestranzi Sharp Knife Services, Bart Maestranzi and Vincent Maestranzi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Sharp v. MECCA Campus School, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02686
Plaintiff:
Ashley Sharp
Defendant:
MECCA Campus School, Inc. and Charles Pogue
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sharpe v. JL&R Investments, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv21914
Plaintiff:
KEYMIA SHARPE
Defendant:
JL&R INVESTMENTS, LLC and Jose L. Laurido
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Brooks et al v. Illusions, Inc et al
as 5:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ashley Brooks , Brian Sharp and Rachel Leblanc
Defendant:
Illusions, Inc and Thomas Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fernandez et al v. Sharp Management Corp.
as 1:2016cv00551
Plaintiff:
William Fernandez and Rigoberto Santana
Defendant:
Sharp Management Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
REINHOLD et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2015cv08580
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. REINHOLD , GLENN MILLER , JAMES CUFFE and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sharp, et al v. CGG Land (U.S.)
as 15-5113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. DANE SHARP, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees, ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, MARIANO ESPINOZA, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CGG LAND (U.S.) INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
