Cases 51 - 60 of 382
In re: Larry Carter, et al v. City of Philadelphia
as 22-1255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
In re: Larry Carter, et al v. City of Philadelphia
as 22-1236
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY CARTER
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Robinson, et al v. Eastman Kodak
as 6:2002cv06204
Plaintiff:
Lawrence T Heinsler, Stephen M. Ellis, Thomas L. Braden and others
Special Master:
Esq. Steven V Modica
Defendant:
Eastman Kodak Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Foster et al v. City of New York, New York
as 1:2014cv04142
Plaintiff:
Rozana Mandelberg, Frederick Savory, Delores Johnson and others
Defendant:
City of New York, New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Carter v. Action Worldwide Transportation, LLC
as 1:2021cv04925
Plaintiff:
Darryl Carter
Defendant:
Action Worldwide Transportation, LLC
Chen et al v. Xpresspa at Term. 4 JFK, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01347
Defendant:
Xpresspa at Term. 4 JFK, LLC, Xpresspa Atlanta Terminal A, LLC, Xpressa Atlanta Terminal C, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chen, Xiao Ling Chen, Zeng Biao Teng and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Patricia Bobbs v. Carter Insurance Claims Services, Inc.
as 2:2021cv07135
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bobbs
Defendant:
Carter Insurance Claims Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carter v. Counseling Alliance of Virginia, LLC
as 3:2021cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kevin Carter
Defendant:
Counseling Alliance of Virginia, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fabi v. Carter-Jones Companies, Inc., d/b/a Carter Lumber
as 4:2021cv11727
Plaintiff:
Sandra Fabi
Defendant:
Carter-Jones Companies, Inc., d/b/a Carter Lumber
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hankins v. Carter et al
as 2:2021cv00141
Plaintiff:
John Hankins
Defendant:
Johnny Carter and Wheeler County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
