Cases 51 - 58 of 58
Moore et al v. Initiative Construction Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv00151
Plaintiff:
James E. Moore, Tim McGough and James E. Moore
Defendant:
Initiative Construction Inc., Isaac Carpenter and Isaac Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Moore et al v. HTN Remodeling, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv05676
Plaintiff:
James E Moore, Tim McGough and James E Moore
Defendant:
HTN Remodeling, Inc. and Thomas J Bodnar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Sanchez et al v. Northwest Steel & Pipe Inc
as 3:2008cv05401
Plaintiff:
Jorge Sanchez, Robert D Chillous, Patricio E Veloso and others
Defendant:
Northwest Steel & Pipe Inc, Northwest Steel & Pipe Inc and Northwest Steel & Pipe Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mooring v. Il Wu Local 10 et al
as 3:2008cv01656
Plaintiff:
Darrell E. Mooring
Defendant:
Il Wu Local 10, Il Wu Local 10, George Galarza and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore et al v. K.J. Wills Construction, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv00251
Plaintiff:
James E Moore, Tim McGough and James E Moore
Defendant:
K.J. Wills Construction, Inc. and Kevin J Wills
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Shotwell et al v. Owens Corning
as 2:2007cv13673
Plaintiff:
Robert Shotwell, Robert Shotwell, Leonard Wagner and others
Defendant:
Owens Corning
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Moore v. Schmitt Electric Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00054
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Moore
Defendant:
Schmitt Electric Inc, David Seal, Derek Schoffen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Elkay Mining Company v. Local Union No. 1751, United Mine Workers of America et al
as 2:1975cv00303
Plaintiff:
Elkay Mining Company
Defendant:
Local Union No. 1751, United Mine Workers of America , Henry Moore, Jr. , Woodyeard Deskins and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
