Cases 61 - 70 of 13,660
Kinahan v. Tri-Com Consulting Group, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Brian Kinahan
Defendant:
Tri-Com Consulting Group, LLC and Connecticut Health Insurance Exchange
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family & Medical Leave Act
Tebo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv20911
Plaintiff:
Pamela Tebo
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
ISAAC v. ON TIME TRANSPORT, INC.
as 2:2024cv03250
Plaintiff:
Nacanda Isaac
Defendant:
On Time Transport, Inc., JOHN DOES 1-5 and JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
GIANNATTASIO v. AMEDISYS HOLDING, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05854
Plaintiff:
TARRA GIANNATTASIO
Defendant:
AMEDISYS HOLDING, LLC, JOHN DOES (1-5) and ABC CORP (6-10)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Crisologo v. Nordstrom Card Services Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Daniel Galvin Crisologo
Defendant:
Nordstrom Card Services Inc and Michael Bengs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
GIAGNACOVA v. 21ST CENTURY CYBER CHARTER SCHOOL et al
as 2:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
NANCY GIAGNACOVA
Defendant:
21ST CENTURY CYBER CHARTER SCHOOL and Dr. Matthew Flannery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Flores v. County of Hidalgo
as 7:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Maria Teresa Flores
Defendant:
County of Hidalgo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Reyes v. Morgan & Morgan PA
as 0:2024cv60743
Plaintiff:
Iveliz Reyes
Defendant:
Morgan & Morgan PA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Peah v. Florence County et al
as 4:2024cv01307
Plaintiff:
Brittany Peay
Defendant:
Florence County, Michelle Hackman and Jesse S Cartrette
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Chaumont v. AT&T CORP.
as 1:2024cv21110
Plaintiff:
Vance Chaumont
Defendant:
AT&T CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
