Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Lemon v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2018cv01029
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Northfolk Southern Corporation
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lemon
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Smith v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv00242
Plaintiff:
Jabrell Keith Smith
Defendant:
Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company, The , Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc and Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503
McCarty v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
Scott C. McCarty
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
McKinley v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2018cv00015
Plaintiff:
Joseph McKinley
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHUBA v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2017cv01379
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SHUBA
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2017cv00925
Plaintiff:
William C. Reed
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2016cv00520
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WEEKS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2016cv00102
Plaintiff:
KEITH WEEKS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bell v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2015cv00257
Plaintiff:
Miles Bell
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Gibbs et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2014cv00587
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gibbs and Chad Quinlin
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
