Cases 21 - 30 of 150
Lane v. Iron Workers Local Union #1 Pension and Annuity Funds
as 1:2020cv06769
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lane
Defendant:
Iron Workers Local Union #1 Pension and Annuity Funds
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc. v. Payne et al
as 1:2019cv11297
Nominal Defendant:
Deborah A. Smith, DST Systems, Inc., Myrl C. Jeffcoat and others
Plaintiff:
Ruane Cuniff & Goldfarb, Inc. and Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc.
Defendant:
Percy Payne, Brenda Keeton, Kathleen Moerschel and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
In Re: Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Foreign Exchange Transactions Litigation
as 1:2012md02335
Defendant:
Arthur Certosimo, Michael J. Kowalski, Samuel C. Scott, III and others
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, Lisa Parker, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Retirement Plan and others
Claimant:
Bridgestone Americas, Inc., Bechtel Corporation, SYNNEX Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, United States Of America and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Bart Florence, Paul Bensi, Jerry Kalmer and others
Petitioner:
Union Asset Management Holding AG, Ironworkers Locals 40, 361 & 417 - Union Security Funds, DeKalb County Pension Fund and others
Interested Party:
David Nichols
Nominal Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Non-Party June Kim
Lead Plaintiff:
State of Oregon By and Through the Oregon State Treasurer on Behalf of the Common School Fund and, Together with the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Board, on Behalf of the Oregon Public Employee Re
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Construction Workers Pension Trust Fund Lake County and Vicinity v. The Lane Construction Corporation
as 2:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
Construction Workers Pension Trust Fund Lake County and Vicinity
Defendant:
The Lane Construction Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Lane & Lane, P.C. v. Holbrook et al
as 4:2019cv00255
Defendant:
Pinnacle Orthopaedics Surgery Center, LLC, The Bortolazzo Group, LLC, Benefit Recovery Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lane & Lane, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund et al v. Lane Company Mechanical, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01028
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Occupational Health Institute Trust, Board of Trustees, International Training Institute for the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Industry, Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Lane Company Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
East Central Illinois Pipe Trades Health & Welfare Fund et al v. The Lane Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01183
Plaintiff:
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union #99 Political Action Committee, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union #99 Organizing Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union #99 Apprentice Fund and others
Defendant:
Barbara Page, The Lane Company, Inc. and Lane Company Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Harcos Chemicals Inc v. Stokes et al
as 3:2019cv00894
Plaintiff:
Harcos Chemicals Inc
Defendant:
Patricia Wertenberger, Paige Megan Stokes and Landon Lane Stokes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. BALDOCK ASSOCIATES et al
as 1:2018cv02178
Defendant:
Robert A. Bruno & Co, Inc., Baldock Associates d/b/a Baldock Health Care Centre, Humbert Lane Associates d/b/a Humbert Lane Nursing and Rehabilitation Centre and others
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL PASTREICH, RODERICK S. BASHIR, STEPHEN ABRECHT and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Lane v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 0:2018cv00994
Plaintiff:
Jan Lane
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
