Cases 31 - 40 of 274
Kaotica Corp. v. Ningbo Alctron Electronics Technology Co, LTD et al
as 8:2020cv00080
Defendant:
NINGBO ALCTRON ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO, LTD., Ningbo Alctron Electronics Technology Co, LTD and John Does
Plaintiff:
KAOTICA CORP.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Six Hogs, LLC v. Doe et al
as 6:2020cv00001
Defendant:
John Doe and Samsonico USA LLC
Plaintiff:
Six Hogs, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Northern Agri Brand LLC v. Cen-Tex Seed, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv00653
Defendant:
Cen-Tex Seed, Inc., Matthew Matus, Suzanne Matus and others
Plaintiff:
Northern Agri Brand LLC
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2321
Precision Piling Systems, LLC v. Superior Foundation Services, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00736
Defendant:
John Does 1-100 and Superior Foundation Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Precision Piling Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Gaughan v. Tractor Supply Company et al
as 2:2019cv00714
Plaintiff:
Rick L Gaughan
Defendant:
John Doe, Tractor Supply Company, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Rosco, Inc. v. Safety Vision, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv08933
Plaintiff:
Rosco, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe Corporation and Safety Vision, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Apothecary Products LLC v. Doe
as 0:2019cv02280
Defendant:
John Doe and Asprink
Plaintiff:
Apothecary Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Apothecary Products LLC v. Doe
as 0:2019cv02279
Defendant:
John Doe, Shenzhenshi Haili Shangmao Youxia Gongsi and Haili
Plaintiff:
Apothecary Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Apothecary Products LLC v. Doe
as 0:2019cv02281
Defendant:
John Doe and Coongga
Plaintiff:
Apothecary Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Apothecary Products LLC v. Doe
as 0:2019cv02278
Defendant:
John Doe, Yosemy an unknown entity and Minanan
Plaintiff:
Apothecary Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
