Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Parking World Wide, LLC v. City of Clayton, Missouri
as 4:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Parking World Wide, LLC
Defendant:
City of Clayton, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nimitz Technologies LLC v. Clayton Homes, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Nimitz Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Clayton Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
E9 Treatments, Inc. v. Kopman LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
E9 TREATMENTS, INC.
Defendant:
KOPMAN LLC and CLAYTON DALE WERNLI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Parking World Wide, LLC v City of San Francisco et al
as 4:2021cv01499
Plaintiff:
Parking World Wide, LLC
Defendant:
City of San Francisco, Serco Group, Plc, Oracle and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
DALE v. SAFOCO, INC.
as 1:2021cv00238
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON DALE
Defendant:
SAFOCO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Clayton International, Inc. v. Nebraska Armes Aviation, LLC et al
as 8:2021cv00309
Plaintiff:
Clayton International, Inc.
Defendant:
Nebraska Armes Aviation, LLC, ENC Products, LLC, Tracy Ogle and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Fabbro v. Blake et al
as 1:2019cv05764
Plaintiff:
Angela Maria Fabbro
Defendant:
Clayton Gunars-Strauts and Jonathan Blake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Jenny Yoo Collection, Inc. v. David's Bridal, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv09926
Defendant:
Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC and David's Bridal, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jenny Yoo Collection, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jenny Yoo Collection, Inc. v. David's Bridal, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02647
Plaintiff:
Jenny Yoo Collection, Inc.
Defendant:
David's Bridal, Inc. , DBD Inc. and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
J-Channel Industries Corporation v. Clayton Homes Inc. et al (TV1)
as 3:2013cv00470
Plaintiff:
J-Channel Industries Corporation
Defendant:
Clayton Homes Inc. and Elixir Industries Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
