Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA), Inc. v. Zipline International, Inc.
as 3:2022cv04480
Plaintiff:
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA), Inc.
Defendant:
Zipline International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ET AL V. COOK GROUP INCORPORATED ET AL
as 1:2017cv03448
Counter Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC. and others
Unknown:
Sara P. Zogg, Sara P. Zogg and Sara P. Zogg
Plaintiff:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.
Counter Claimant:
COOK GROUP INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and others
Defendant:
COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
MATHIS v. UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE et al
as 2:2015cv03584
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MATHIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE, SARA B. SAMSON and COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Sara Maita v. Anita Schu-Chiam Shyun Sun et al
as 2:2013cv01969
Defendant:
Does, Duke Fu, Karmissie LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sara Maita
Voytek Siwiec v. Anita Schu-Chiam Shyun Sun et al
as 2:2012cv06410
Defendant:
Sara Ella Maita and Anita Schu-Chiam Shyun Sun
Plaintiff:
Voytek Siwiec
Lamina Packaging Innovations, LLC v. Sara Happ, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00310
Plaintiff:
Lamina Packaging Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
Sara Happ, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Promote Innovation LLC v. Sara Lee Corporation
as 2:2010cv00387
Plaintiff:
Promote Innovation LLC
Defendant:
Sara Lee Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lemelson Medical Ed v. Alcon Laboratories, et al
as 2:2000cv00661
Defendant:
Pillsbury Company, New Dana Perfumes Company, Quaker Oats Company and others
Plaintiff:
Lemelson Medical, Education & Research Foundation LP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
