Cases 21 - 30 of 1,324
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
STA Group LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
STA Group LLC
Defendant:
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Motorola Solutions Malaysia SDN. BHD., et al v. Hytera Communications Corporation Ltd.
as 24-1531
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS MALAYSIA SDN. BHD. and MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
HYTERA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION LTD.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
VDPP, LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC
as 3:2024cv01672
Plaintiff:
VDPP, LLC
Defendant:
Motorola Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Largan Precision Co., Ltd. v. Motorola Mobility LLC
as 24-1540
Appellant:
LARGAN PRECISION CO., LTD.
Defendant / Appellee:
MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
Payvox LLC v. Motorola Moblity LLC
as 1:2024cv01627
Plaintiff:
Payvox LLC
Defendant:
Motorola Moblity LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. Lenovo (United States), Inc.
as 24-1515
Plaintiff:
TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON
Counter Defendant:
ERICSSON AB and ERICSSON, INC.
Defendant:
LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC., MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, LENOVO (SHANGHAI) ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae:
ACT THE APP ASSOCIATION
Courtemanche et al v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv40030
Plaintiff:
Jason Courtemanche, Brett Foresman, Juan Rios and others
Defendant:
Motorola Solutions, Inc., Colonel John E Mawn, Jr, Callyo 2009 Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Largan Precision Co., Ltd. v. Motorola Mobility LLC
as 24-1468
Appellant:
LARGAN PRECISION CO., LTD.
Defendant / Appellee:
MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
